Breast implants in athletic women

Women athletes arguably have more obstacles to overcome than their male counterparts, title 9 and lack of career options in professional sports notwithstanding. Lower natural levels of muscle-building hormones such as testosterone means even harder work to develop strength, and the lean build that is beautiful in so many ways becomes less feminine at the same time. There are several versions of attractive female figures, but for many athletes the desire to have at least a few womanly curves is natural. The choice to have breast implants is both personal and justifiable, yet opinions of the many seem to be given credence.
That is probably part of the reason why there has been so much media coverage of the decision of Australian hurdler Jana Rawlingson to have her breast implants removed. Apparently she has decent odds of medaling in the next summer Olympics but felt that the implants might get in the way. Frankly that is a little bit hard to imagine unless they were large to begin with, which is not a typical choice for an athlete in the first place. I wish her luck but if she does well it will be because of her dedication and training, not because she had her implants out.
The question of implants in athletes deserves serious attention from plastic surgeons who breast augmentation, though, because there are unique issues that need to be addressed. Ordinarily, with low body fat and small breasts, submuscular placement of the implants gives a more natural look. However, with a lot of muscle development that just isn’t a good choice for a number of reasons, some obvious and others not. I have been using an in-between option called subfascial implant placement (fascia pronounced like fashion) in cases like these. This provides support for the implants and more natural curves. Combined with small, usually low-profile implants, this results in more real-looking and proportionate breasts. Whether these breasts are truly more aerodynamic is another question.